libsForQt5.kcolorpicker 0.2.0 -> 0.3.0 https://repology.org/project/kcolorpicker/versions attrpath: libsForQt5.kcolorpicker Checking auto update branch... No auto update branch exists [version] [version] updated version and sha256 [rustCrateVersion] [rustCrateVersion] No cargoSha256 or cargoHash found [golangModuleVersion] [golangModuleVersion] Not a buildGoModule package with vendorSha256 or vendorHash [npmDepsVersion] [npmDepsVersion] No npmDepsHash [updateScript] [updateScript] skipping because derivation has no updateScript Diff after rewrites: diff --git a/pkgs/development/libraries/kcolorpicker/default.nix b/pkgs/development/libraries/kcolorpicker/default.nix index 4647d65882cd..036586403b49 100644 --- a/pkgs/development/libraries/kcolorpicker/default.nix +++ b/pkgs/development/libraries/kcolorpicker/default.nix @@ -2,13 +2,13 @@ mkDerivation rec { pname = "kcolorpicker"; - version = "0.2.0"; + version = "0.3.0"; src = fetchFromGitHub { owner = "ksnip"; repo = "kColorPicker"; rev = "v${version}"; - sha256 = "sha256-ahmMj/yzQiRP9oJwDuhJGxe849kxNsoGFDZ2CGQNhKs="; + sha256 = "sha256-gkjlIiLB3/074EEFrQUa0djvVt/C44O3afqqNis64P0="; }; nativeBuildInputs = [ cmake ]; Successfully finished processing cachix "/nix/store/py7bzp8mnyidsn6q963m8kr5wcqqkq2v-kcolorpicker-0.3.0" [check][nixpkgs-review] Result of `nixpkgs-review` run on x86_64-linux [1](https://github.com/Mic92/nixpkgs-review)
4 packages failed to build:
1 package built:
Automatic update generated by [nixpkgs-update](https://github.com/ryantm/nixpkgs-update) tools. This update was made based on information from https://repology.org/project/kcolorpicker/versions. meta.description for libsForQt5.kcolorpicker is: Qt based Color Picker with popup menu meta.homepage for libsForQt5.kcolorpicker is: https://github.com/ksnip/kColorPicker ###### Updates performed - Version update ###### To inspect upstream changes - [Compare changes on GitHub](https://github.com/ksnip/kColorPicker/compare/v0.2.0...v0.3.0) ###### Impact Checks done --- - built on NixOS - The tests defined in `passthru.tests`, if any, passed - found 0.3.0 with grep in /nix/store/py7bzp8mnyidsn6q963m8kr5wcqqkq2v-kcolorpicker-0.3.0 - found 0.3.0 in filename of file in /nix/store/py7bzp8mnyidsn6q963m8kr5wcqqkq2v-kcolorpicker-0.3.0 ---
Rebuild report (if merged into master) (click to expand) ``` 9 total rebuild path(s) 9 package rebuild(s) First fifty rebuilds by attrpath ksnip libsForQt5.gwenview libsForQt5.kcolorpicker libsForQt5.kimageannotator libsForQt5.spectacle plasma5Packages.gwenview plasma5Packages.kcolorpicker plasma5Packages.kimageannotator plasma5Packages.spectacle ```
Instructions to test this update (click to expand) --- Either **download from Cachix**: ``` nix-store -r /nix/store/py7bzp8mnyidsn6q963m8kr5wcqqkq2v-kcolorpicker-0.3.0 \ --option binary-caches 'https://cache.nixos.org/ https://nix-community.cachix.org/' \ --option trusted-public-keys ' nix-community.cachix.org-1:mB9FSh9qf2dCimDSUo8Zy7bkq5CX+/rkCWyvRCYg3Fs= cache.nixos.org-1:6NCHdD59X431o0gWypbMrAURkbJ16ZPMQFGspcDShjY= ' ``` (The Cachix cache is only trusted for this store-path realization.) For the Cachix download to work, your user must be in the `trusted-users` list or you can use `sudo` since root is effectively trusted. Or, **build yourself**: ``` nix-build -A libsForQt5.kcolorpicker https://github.com/r-ryantm/nixpkgs/archive/5050a0a767efb2c1ed6c74e8337e9c18582402e5.tar.gz ``` Or: ``` nix build github:r-ryantm/nixpkgs/5050a0a767efb2c1ed6c74e8337e9c18582402e5#libsForQt5.kcolorpicker ``` After you've downloaded or built it, look at the files and if there are any, run the binaries: ``` ls -la /nix/store/py7bzp8mnyidsn6q963m8kr5wcqqkq2v-kcolorpicker-0.3.0 ls -la /nix/store/py7bzp8mnyidsn6q963m8kr5wcqqkq2v-kcolorpicker-0.3.0/bin ``` ---

### Pre-merge build results We have automatically built all packages that will get rebuilt due to this change. This gives evidence on whether the upgrade will break dependent packages. Note sometimes packages show up as _failed to build_ independent of the change, simply because they are already broken on the target branch. Result of `nixpkgs-review` run on x86_64-linux [1](https://github.com/Mic92/nixpkgs-review)
4 packages failed to build:
1 package built:
--- ###### Maintainer pings cc @FliegendeWurst for [testing](https://github.com/ryantm/nixpkgs-update/blob/master/doc/nixpkgs-maintainer-faq.md#r-ryantm-opened-a-pr-for-my-package-what-do-i-do). https://api.github.com/repos/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls/282026